Verse

Luke 12:15 - 21 And he said unto them, Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man's life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth.

Tuesday, 15 April 2025

Rodrigo Roa Duterte as the Greatest Drug Lord?

 

Debunking the False Narrative: Rodrigo Roa Duterte as the Greatest Drug Lord

One of the most widespread yet unfounded accusations against former President Rodrigo Roa Duterte (PRRD) during his tenure as the 16th President of the Republic of the Philippines (2016–2022) is the claim that he is the “greatest drug lord.” This accusation, often propagated by political opponents and critics of Duterte’s war on drugs, is not supported by facts or credible evidence. In fact, such claims are strategically crafted to undermine his legitimacy and policy on narcotics control, which, although controversial, was recognized as an essential part of his administration’s efforts to combat the illegal drug trade. A closer examination of the policies, statements, and actions of PRRD reveals that far from being involved in the drug trade, he led a vigorous, albeit contentious, campaign to eradicate narcotics in the Philippines.

1. Commitment to the War on Drugs

Duterte’s stance on drugs has always been clear, marked by his consistent rhetoric and policy actions aimed at dismantling drug syndicates. His administration's “War on Drugs” was launched immediately after he assumed office in June 2016. Through his aggressive approach, Duterte ordered law enforcement agencies to intensify efforts to target high-profile drug lords and syndicates, regardless of their political affiliations or connections. Duterte’s war on drugs resulted in thousands of operations, arrests, and drug seizures (Agnes, 2020).

Far from benefiting from the drug trade, Duterte's focus was on neutralizing drug cartels and syndicates, often in the face of significant public criticism, both domestically and internationally. His anti-drug campaign led to the arrest and prosecution of thousands of drug offenders, and major drug personalities were captured or killed in police operations. The Duterte administration's efforts resulted in the dismantling of drug manufacturing laboratories and the seizure of massive drug shipments (Philippine National Police, 2021).

2. Duterte’s Past as a Public Prosecutor

Before becoming president, Duterte served as Mayor of Davao City for over two decades, where he gained a reputation for his tough stance on crime, including illegal drugs. During his tenure as mayor, he was often praised for his zero-tolerance policy towards drug abuse, contributing to a significant decrease in drug-related incidents in Davao. Duterte's emphasis on maintaining peace and order in his city translated into the arrest of drug criminals and the dismantling of drug operations under his watch (Schultz, 2017).

Given his track record as a public official dedicated to law enforcement, the notion that Duterte could simultaneously lead a successful anti-drug campaign while being involved in drug trafficking is entirely contradictory and unsupported by any credible evidence.

3. Unfounded Allegations by Opponents

The accusations of Duterte being the “greatest drug lord” largely stem from his political adversaries who aim to discredit his leadership and his war on drugs. Critics have suggested that Duterte might be benefiting from the drug trade, pointing to the widespread reach of narcotics in the Philippines and claiming that he allows it for personal gain. However, these claims are speculative, lacking substantiation or solid proof.

In contrast to these accusations, Duterte has repeatedly called for the elimination of drug-related corruption in government and law enforcement, which he viewed as a major hindrance to the fight against drugs (Duterte, 2016). The notion that a president who is actively dismantling the narcotics industry could simultaneously be the mastermind behind it is highly implausible and not rooted in fact.

4. Support for the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA)

Throughout his presidency, Duterte strongly supported the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA), the primary government agency tasked with the enforcement of drug laws. The PDEA, under Duterte’s administration, saw an increase in operational funding and support, which allowed it to implement successful drug busts and operations. The seizure of illegal drugs, such as shabu (methamphetamine), from overseas trafficking operations was a critical part of Duterte’s approach (PDEA, 2021).

By bolstering PDEA’s operations and prioritizing drug law enforcement, Duterte demonstrated a commitment to fighting the very drugs that he is falsely accused of promoting.

5. International Recognition of Duterte’s Drug Campaign

The international community's reaction to Duterte’s drug war has been mixed. While many human rights groups and Western governments have condemned the high death toll attributed to extrajudicial killings, numerous leaders within Southeast Asia and other parts of the world have expressed support for his stance on drugs. Duterte’s efforts to control narcotics were seen by many as a necessary response to an escalating crisis that was crippling local communities and families.

According to a United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) report, the Philippines had become a major center of the methamphetamine trade in the region, making the war on drugs an urgent matter (UNODC, 2020). Duterte’s policy, although contentious, aimed to address this serious national crisis, and his emphasis on reducing drug-related violence was consistent with global trends in drug enforcement.

Conclusion

The accusation that Rodrigo Duterte is the "greatest drug lord" is not supported by any legitimate evidence or factual basis. On the contrary, his tenure as president was marked by a commitment to the destruction of drug cartels, dismantling of drug syndicates, and a strong public stance against drug abuse. His administration’s aggressive anti-drug efforts, although controversial, were grounded in the belief that the Philippine society had to take a firm stand against the destruction caused by illegal drugs.

The narrative of Duterte as a drug lord is merely a politically motivated attempt to discredit his accomplishments in combating narcotics and maintaining national security. There is no substantial evidence to support these claims, and they ultimately seek to undermine the effective, albeit polarizing, measures that Duterte implemented to protect the Filipino people.


References

Agnes, G. (2020). The Duterte Drug War: A 2020 Report on the Philippines' Efforts to Fight Drug Abuse. Manila Review.

Duterte, R. R. (2016). Speech on the War on Drugs. Malacañang Palace.

Philippine National Police. (2021). Annual Report on Drug Seizures and Arrests. Retrieved from https://www.pnp.gov.ph

PDEA. (2021). Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency's Annual Drug Seizure and Enforcement Report. Retrieved from https://www.pdea.gov.ph

Schultz, C. (2017). Duterte's War on Drugs in Davao City: A Historical Overview. Philippine Studies Review, 22(3), 45-61.

UNODC. (2020). The Philippines and the Methamphetamine Trade: A Global Drug Crisis. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

Monday, 14 April 2025

Debunking the Narrative on PRRD's Link to the Leftist

 

🧱 1. PRRD’s Strong Anti-Communist Stance

🔹 Creation of NTF-ELCAC (2018):

  • Duterte created the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) through Executive Order No. 70.

  • Its purpose: to end the 50+ years of insurgency by the CPP-NPA-NDF through a Whole-of-Nation Approach, combining military action, local government engagement, and socio-economic development.

“We will not let the communist insurgency continue to thrive in our country. It has to stop now.” – PRRD

🔹 Declaration of CPP-NPA as Terrorist Organizations:

  • Duterte signed Proclamation No. 374 on December 5, 2017, declaring the CPP-NPA as a terrorist organization under the Human Security Act.

  • He consistently rejected calls for negotiation with the CPP-NPA when they continued armed violence.


🛡️ 2. Consistent Offensive Against the NPA

  • Under Duterte, the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) launched intensive military campaigns that led to:

    • Dismantling of 75 guerilla fronts

    • Surrender of over 25,000 former rebels

    • Neutralization of hundreds of high-ranking CPP-NPA commanders

“Let’s be clear, communism is an obsolete ideology. It has brought nothing but death and destruction.” – Duterte (State of the Nation Address, 2020)


🔥 3. Broken Peace Talks Due to NPA Attacks

  • Although Duterte initially attempted peace talks (as several presidents did), he terminated them in 2017 after repeated NPA ambushes on government forces and civilians, especially during ceasefire periods.

  • He emphasized that trust was broken and that the CPP-NPA-NDF was insincere in pursuing peace.

“We were talking peace, but they were killing my soldiers and police. I don’t deal with traitors.” – PRRD


👥 4. No Political or Ideological Alignment With the Left

  • While he allowed left-leaning individuals into his Cabinet early on (e.g., Judy Taguiwalo, Rafael Mariano), this was in line with his inclusive governance style, not ideological alignment.

  • These individuals were later removed or not reappointed due to policy disagreements and alleged links to communist front organizations.


📢 5. Consistent Condemnation of CPP-NPA in Speeches

  • Duterte repeatedly condemned the CPP-NPA in his speeches, even calling Jose Maria Sison a "delusional terrorist" and challenging him to return to the Philippines.

  • He accused the NPA of exploiting indigenous peoples, using children as combatants, and destroying communities.


Conclusion

Rodrigo Duterte is not a leftist.

  • His administration implemented the most aggressive anti-communist policies in recent Philippine history.

  • The NTF-ELCAC, the terrorist designation of CPP-NPA, and military offensives under his leadership all prove his unwavering opposition to communist ideology and insurgency.

Any narrative claiming he is leftist is either based on misinformation, misinterpretation of early cabinet appointments, or intentional political distortion.


Debunking the Misconception: Rodrigo Roa Duterte as a Leftist

In recent years, various political narratives have emerged attempting to portray former President Rodrigo Roa Duterte (PRRD) as aligned with leftist ideology or sympathetic to communist insurgent groups. This claim, however, stands in direct contradiction to Duterte’s policies, public statements, and actions during his term as the 16th President of the Republic of the Philippines from 2016 to 2022. A factual examination reveals that PRRD, rather than exhibiting leftist leanings, spearheaded one of the most aggressive campaigns against the Communist Party of the Philippines–New People’s Army–National Democratic Front (CPP–NPA–NDF) in the country’s history.

1. Creation of the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC)

Through Executive Order No. 70, signed in December 2018, President Duterte institutionalized the Whole-of-Nation Approach in addressing communist insurgency. The order created the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC), designed to synchronize government efforts across all levels in combatting communist terrorism, not merely through military operations, but also via social services, infrastructure, education, and livelihood programs. This strategic framework demonstrated Duterte's commitment to a holistic and sustainable approach in defeating the CPP-NPA-NDF.

2. Designation of CPP-NPA as Terrorist Organizations

On December 5, 2017, President Duterte signed Proclamation No. 374, formally designating the CPP-NPA as terrorist organizations under the Human Security Act of 2007. This marked a significant policy shift from prior administrations that engaged primarily through peace negotiations. By this designation, Duterte underscored the government's position that the CPP-NPA's violent activities constituted acts of terrorism, not legitimate political dissent.

3. Termination of Peace Talks with the Communist Movement

While Duterte initially engaged in peace negotiations with the CPP-NPA-NDF—consistent with longstanding government policy—he ultimately terminated the talks in November 2017. This decision followed a series of NPA-perpetrated attacks on state security forces and civilians during declared ceasefire periods. Duterte cited the group’s duplicity and continued armed aggression as key reasons for ending the dialogue, stating, “We were talking peace, but they were killing my soldiers and police. I don’t deal with traitors.”

4. Massive Counterinsurgency Campaign and Neutralization of Guerilla Fronts

Under Duterte’s administration, the Armed Forces of the Philippines, in coordination with the NTF-ELCAC, dismantled a significant number of guerilla fronts and facilitated the surrender of thousands of former rebels. According to the Department of the Interior and Local Government, over 25,000 rebels surrendered, and more than 75 guerilla fronts were neutralized. Former insurgents were reintegrated into society through the Enhanced Comprehensive Local Integration Program (E-CLIP), further emphasizing Duterte’s non-alignment with leftist causes.

5. Rejection of Leftist Cabinet Appointees and Ideological Disconnect

Early in his term, Duterte appointed several left-leaning individuals to his Cabinet as a gesture of inclusivity. However, these appointees, such as Judy Taguiwalo (DSWD) and Rafael Mariano (DA), were later removed or not reappointed due to policy disagreements and their perceived affiliations with organizations linked to communist ideology. These developments reveal that Duterte’s openness to diverse perspectives did not equate to ideological alliance or sympathy.

6. Public Condemnation of Communist Leadership

Duterte repeatedly denounced CPP founding chairman Jose Maria Sison and other communist leaders in his speeches. He accused them of perpetuating decades of violence and hindering national development. At one point, he challenged Sison to return to the Philippines and face trial, calling him a “delusional terrorist” and labeling the CPP-NPA-NDF as "obsolete and destructive."

The notion that President Rodrigo Duterte is a leftist is fundamentally inconsistent with his policy decisions, national security directives, and public pronouncements. While he once explored peaceful avenues to end the communist insurgency, his eventual stance was marked by a clear, strategic, and forceful opposition to the CPP-NPA-NDF. Far from being a sympathizer, Duterte's administration mounted the most significant anti-communist campaign in recent history, ultimately contributing to the dismantling of insurgent structures and the reintegration of thousands of former rebels into mainstream society.

Thus, claims painting PRRD as a leftist are not only misleading but also undermine the sacrifices made by state security forces and former rebels who embraced peace through his administration's initiatives.


References

Department of the Interior and Local Government. (2020). DILG: Over 75 NPA guerrilla fronts neutralized under Duterte administration. Retrieved from https://www.dilg.gov.ph

Duterte, R. R. (2017). Press conference, November 2017. Malacañang Palace.

Mella, M. (2017). Duterte orders termination of peace talks with communist rebels. The Philippine Star. Retrieved from https://www.philstar.com

Office of the President. (2018). Executive Order No. 70. Retrieved from https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph

Republic of the Philippines. (2017). Proclamation No. 374. Retrieved from https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph

Ramos, P. (2019). Duterte slams Sison as ‘delusional terrorist’ during speech in Bataan. Manila Bulletin. Retrieved from https://www.mb.com.ph



The NTF ELCAC Story

 The NTF ELCAC

During President Rodrigo Roa Duterte's administration, the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) implemented a comprehensive strategy to curb the growth of the New People's Army (NPA) and dismantle communist insurgency in the Philippines. Here are the key achievements:​Philippine News Agency+11Philippine News Agency+11PIA+11


📉 Reduction of NPA Guerrilla Fronts


🕊️ Surrender and Reintegration of Rebels

  • Over 20,000 individuals associated with the CPP-NPA-NDF surrendered between 2016 and 2021.Philippine News Agency

  • The Enhanced Comprehensive Local Integration Program (E-CLIP) facilitated the reintegration of former rebels, providing them with livelihood assistance and support.Philippine News Agency


🏘️ Barangay Development Program (BDP)

  • The BDP targeted barangays cleared of insurgency, providing them with infrastructure projects such as roads, schools, health stations, and livelihood programs.PIA+1Philippine News Agency+1

  • By 2023, a total of 959 villages benefited from the BDP, receiving development projects worth up to PHP 20 million each.Philippine News Agency+1PIA+1


⚖️ Legal Actions and Community Engagement


🏗️ Infrastructure and Basic Services

  • Construction of thousands of kilometers of roads and bridges to improve access to remote areas.

  • Electrification of 40 sitios and establishment of over 8,000 barangay health stations.NTF-ELCAC

  • Closure of insurgency-linked schools and establishment of 9,691 "last mile" schools to provide education in far-flung areas.NTF-ELCAC


These concerted efforts under the NTF-ELCAC's whole-of-nation approach significantly weakened the NPA's presence and influence, contributing to enhanced peace and development across the Philippines during President Duterte's tenure.


After PRRD's Term

Several lawmakers, particularly from the Makabayan bloc and other progressive groups, have called for the defunding or abolition of the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC). Their concerns center on the task force's alleged inefficiencies, such as delays in implementing Barangay Development Program (BDP) projects, and accusations of red-tagging against activists and community organizers.GMA Network | News and Entertainment

🏛️ Lawmakers Advocating to Defund or Abolish NTF-ELCAC

House of Representatives

  • Rep. Raoul Manuel (Kabataan Party-list): Manuel has consistently advocated for defunding the NTF-ELCAC, citing delays in project implementation and proposing that its budget be reallocated to national agencies focusing on education, health, and social services.Inquirer.net+3Home | DZRH News Official Website+3Malaya Business Insight+3

  • Rep. Arlene Brosas (Gabriela Party-list): Brosas has opposed increasing the NTF-ELCAC's budget, asserting that it is used for repression and harassment of progressive groups. She supports defunding the task force and redirecting funds to social services.Malaya Business Insight+1Inquirer.net+1

  • Rep. France Castro (ACT Teachers Party-list): Castro has called for the abolition of the NTF-ELCAC, arguing that its budget diverts crucial funds from essential social services and economic development.Philstar

Senate

  • Sen. Risa Hontiveros: Hontiveros has supported defunding the NTF-ELCAC, criticizing its red-tagging practices and advocating for reallocating its budget to health and social welfare programs.GMA Network | News and Entertainment+2RAPPLER+2Inquirer.net+2

  • Sen. Joel Villanueva: Villanueva has expressed that the NTF-ELCAC's actions are a misuse of public funds and has called for its defunding, suggesting the budget be used for pandemic-related assistance.RAPPLER

  • Sen. Sherwin Gatchalian: Gatchalian has agreed with calls to defund the NTF-ELCAC, stating that the task force's activities do not justify the use of taxpayers' money.

  • Sen. Nancy Binay: Binay has advocated for a thorough review of the NTF-ELCAC's budget, emphasizing the need to assess its effectiveness and the appropriateness of its funding.GMA Network | News and Entertainment

  • Sen. Franklin Drilon: Drilon has urged for the realignment of the NTF-ELCAC's budget to provide financial assistance to citizens affected by the pandemic, highlighting the need for funds in more critical areas.

  • Sen. Grace Poe: Poe has joined other senators in calling for the defunding of the NTF-ELCAC, advocating for the reallocation of its budget to aid pandemic-hit citizens.

These lawmakers argue that the NTF-ELCAC's budget would be more effectively used if allocated to programs addressing education, health, and social services, especially in light of the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing concerns about human rights.



The defunding of the NTF-ELCAC (National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict) can have significant ill-effects on Philippine society, particularly in areas historically affected by communist insurgency. Below are key consequences based on current reports, expert analysis, and historical context:


🇵🇭 1. Resurgence of Communist Insurgency (NPA)

  • Reduced Counterinsurgency Operations: Without funding, localized efforts to dismantle guerrilla fronts may weaken, giving the New People’s Army (NPA) room to regroup, rearm, and reestablish influence in remote barangays.

  • Security vacuum: Peace and order in geographically isolated and disadvantaged areas (GIDAs) may deteriorate, making civilians more vulnerable to extortion, recruitment, and violence.

📖 “When the government presence fades, insurgents thrive.” — security analyst Jose Antonio Custodio


🏚️ 2. Stalled Development in Cleared Barangays

  • The Barangay Development Program (BDP) provides ₱20 million per cleared barangay for infrastructure, schools, water systems, health stations, and livelihood support.

  • Defunding means thousands of barangays may lose critical government support, risking a return to underdevelopment, and making communities susceptible again to rebel propaganda.

📊 As of 2023, 959 barangays benefited from BDP — helping prevent NPA resurgence through development.


🧒 3. Youth Radicalization and NPA Recruitment

  • NTF-ELCAC plays a role in countering radical recruitment, especially among students and indigenous youth, through information drives and deradicalization programs.

  • Defunding may weaken government response to CPP-NPA infiltration in schools and universities, leading to a spike in ideological recruitment.


🧑‍🤝‍🧑 4. Collapse of Local Peace Engagements

  • The task force enables Local Peace Engagements (LPEs) that allow surrender, amnesty, and community reintegration of rebels through the E-CLIP program.

  • Without funding, rebel reintegration will stall, pushing ex-rebels back to armed struggle due to lack of livelihood and support.


📉 5. Loss of National Unity and "Whole-of-Nation" Approach

  • NTF-ELCAC embodies the whole-of-nation approach—coordinating between 40+ government agencies to address root causes of insurgency.

  • Defunding may disrupt this inter-agency coordination, leading to fragmented and ineffective responses to national security threats.


💸 6. Waste of Previous Government Investments

  • The gains made in dismantling 89 NPA guerrilla fronts may go to waste if continuity is cut short.

  • Billions already invested in infrastructure, peace-building, and social programs may not bear long-term fruit without sustained implementation.


🛑 7. Empowerment of Anti-Government Propaganda

  • The disbanding or weakening of NTF-ELCAC will be portrayed as a victory by leftist militants and anti-government groups, emboldening their cause.

  • It sends a message that armed struggle may still succeed, undermining democratic processes and weakening public morale.


🔚 Summary: Key Ill-Effects of Defunding NTF-ELCAC

SectorConsequence
SecurityNPA resurgence and instability in rural areas
DevelopmentHalted projects in conflict-cleared barangays
YouthIncreased vulnerability to communist recruitment
ReintegrationCollapse of rebel surrender and livelihood programs
GovernanceBreakdown of multi-agency national approach
Public FundsWasted past investments and unfinished projects
MoraleStrengthened communist propaganda





🗣️ Testimonies from Local Officials and Former Rebels

1. Local Officials:

  • Mayor Roberto Necor of Barbaza, Antique expressed gratitude for the NTF-ELCAC's initiatives, stating that the task force's dialogues with former rebels have been instrumental in addressing their concerns and facilitating their reintegration into society.

2. Former Rebels:

  • Over 45,000 former rebels have been reintegrated into society through the Enhanced Comprehensive Local Integration Program (E-CLIP), receiving support such as livelihood assistance, housing, and education. This has significantly improved their quality of life and reduced the likelihood of returning to insurgency.


📊 Comparison of Peace Efforts Before and After NTF-ELCAC Implementation

AspectBefore NTF-ELCAC (Pre-2018)After NTF-ELCAC (2018–2024)
Guerrilla Fronts89 active frontsReduced to 4 weakened fronts
Former Rebel ReintegrationLimited programs with minimal reachOver 45,000 former rebels reintegrated through E-CLIP
Barangay DevelopmentSporadic and uncoordinated effortsOver 4,800 projects completed in vulnerable communities
Peace and SecurityOngoing conflicts with frequent skirmishesDeclaration of 35 provinces, 8 cities, and 3 regions as stable and secure






🏞️ Mindanao: Tangub City, Misamis Occidental

  • Barangays Impacted: Sicot, Owayan, San Antonio, and Hoyohoy.​

  • Community Feedback: Residents reported enhanced peace and order, improved socioeconomic conditions, and stronger relationships with the government following NTF-ELCAC interventions.​

  • Study Findings: A mixed-method study involving 140 respondents indicated that the task force's initiatives led to significant positive changes in these communities. ResearchGate


🏔️ Cordillera Administrative Region (CAR)

  • Regional Task Force Formation: CAR established its Regional Task Force to implement the Whole-of-Nation approach, focusing on addressing the root causes of insurgency through community development and engagement. ReliefWeb


🏝️ Visayas: Negros Occidental

  • Localized Peace Engagements: The provincial task force conducted virtual meetings and strategic communication initiatives to promote peace and address local concerns related to insurgency.Peace.gov.ph


🏙️ Central Luzon

  • Collaborative Efforts: Government agencies and stakeholders under the Barangay Development Program (BDP) worked together to implement projects aimed at improving infrastructure and services in conflict-affected barangays.NCIP


These regional initiatives demonstrate NTF-ELCAC's commitment to fostering peace and development across various parts of the Philippines. If you're interested in more detailed information about specific projects or outcomes in a particular region, feel free to ask!

PRAY UNTIL YOU GET THE ASSURANCE.

PRAY UNTIL YOU GET THR ASSURANCE.




PRAY UNTIL YOU GET THR ASSURANCE.
When we needed five million dollars to build the church already contracted, I had a clear-cut vision, a clear-cut goal, and a burning desire to build this church which would seat 10,000 people. But my heart was full of fear. I was shaky, fearful, and I had no assurance. I was like a frightened rabbit, and that five million dollars looked like Mount Everest. To rich foreigners a million dollars may mean relatively little; but to Koreans a million dollars means a great deal of money. So I began to pray like a person dying. I said, “Lord, now they’ve started working. But still I have no assurance. I don’t know where we can get all this money.”

I began travailing. A month passed, and still I had no peace and no assurance. A second month passed and I was praying into the middle of the nights. I would roll out of the bed and go to the corner and cry, sobbing my heart out. My wife thought that I was losing my mind, but I was mentally blinded. I would just stand, without thinking, worrying about the five million dollars.

After I prayed incessantly like that for three months, one morning my wife called, “Honey, breakfast is ready.” As I was walking out of my study, just about to sit in the chair, suddenly the heavens opened up and the tremendous blessings of the Lord poured into my heart! And this great title deed, the substance and the assurance, were imparted into my soul. Suddenly I jumped out of my chair like a shot and I began to shout, “I’ve got it, I’ve got it, oh, I’ve got it!!”

My wife rushed out of the kitchen and when I looked at her I saw that her face was absolutely pale. She was frightened, and taking me, said, “Honey, what’s happened to you? Are you all right? Sit down.”
“I’ve got it!” I, replied. “What do you have?”
“I have five million dollars,” I strongly asserted.
Then she sailed,“ You are really crazy now. Really crazy.”
“But Honey, I’ve got all these five million dollars inside of me. They’re growing now! Oh, inside me it’s growing!!” Suddenly those five million dollars had turned into a small pebble on my palm. I prayed with assurance.

My faith reached out, and I grabbed hold that five million dollars; it was mine.
I got the substance, and once you have the substance— the title deed, the legal paper—whether you see those things or not, legally those things are bound to come to you because legally those things belong to you. So pray through until you have this assurance.

I prayed through the early part of this year and God gave me the assurance of a total of 50,000 members in my church. So I claimed it, and in my heart I see 50,000 members. Those members are inside of me, growing, and as the vision grows inside of me, the same is growing outside. This is the secret: pray until you get the substance, the assurance.
- Dr. Yongi Cho ( The Fourth Dimension )

Aimee Semple McPherson

 Aimee Semple McPherson


Aimee Semple McPherson was once holding a tent meeting, and while she was ministering, the Lord dropped in her spirit the words, “I want to do a creative miracle.”
Without hesitation, she declared, “God wants to do a creative miracle! If you are in need, come down here to the front!” She gave the call for about ten minutes, however nobody responded so she went right on preaching.
The Lord prompted her again, so she gave the call again for about another ten minutes. Finally a woman in a chair with a blanket over her lap came up to the front. She stated, “I know you said God wanted to do a creative miracle, but I didn’t know if you meant this creative.” Just then she pulled back the blanket to reveal she had a baby that had no arms, no legs, and a deformed face.

Sister Aimee then prayed a simple prayer for the child then she said, “let’s all lift up our hands and worship God!” For thirty minutes they did nothing but worship God and then something amazing happened! All four of the baby’s limbs grew out of its little torso and the face was completely restored back to normal!

Sunday, 13 April 2025

The Invisible War

 



Homiletics: The Art of Expository Preaching

 

Homiletics: The Art of Expository Preaching

By Dr. Rick Griffith – Expanded Teaching Outline


I. THE NATURE AND NECESSITY OF HOMILETICS

A. Definition of Homiletics

  1. Homiletics is the science and art of preaching the Word of God.

  2. The term derives from the Greek homilia meaning “conversation” or “discourse.”

B. Importance of Homiletics

  1. Equips the preacher to interpret and communicate the Bible accurately (2 Tim. 2:15).

  2. Preserves the integrity of the biblical message.

  3. Meets the spiritual needs of the congregation through sound doctrine (Titus 1:9).

C. Goal of Homiletics

  1. To glorify God through faithful exposition of His Word.

  2. To transform lives through the application of biblical truth.

  3. To build a biblical worldview in the Church.


II. CHARACTERISTICS OF EXPOSITORY PREACHING

A. Scripture-Centered

  • The message arises directly from the biblical text.

B. Exegetically Faithful

  • The sermon reflects the original intent of the author.

C. Theologically Grounded

  • The sermon aligns with sound doctrine.

D. Application-Oriented

  • Clear implications and applications are made for the contemporary audience.

E. Spirit-Empowered

  • The preacher depends on the Holy Spirit in preparation and delivery.


III. THE TEN-STEP PROCESS OF SERMON PREPARATION

(Adapted from Ramesh Richard's model and used in Griffith’s training)

Step 1: Select the Passage

  • Choose a unit of Scripture with a complete idea (pericope).

Step 2: Study the Passage Deeply

  • Analyze the grammar, context, structure, and key terms.

Step 3: Create the Exegetical Outline

  • Identify the flow of thought and structure within the text.

Step 4: Determine the Exegetical Idea

  • Write the main theological idea in one sentence.

Step 5: Define the Purpose of the Text

  • Discover what the author intended to accomplish.

Step 6: Build the Bridge

  • Relate the original context to modern life.

Step 7: Develop the Homiletical Idea

  • Reformulate the exegetical idea into a message for today.

Step 8: Construct the Homiletical Outline

  • Organize sermon points that develop the Big Idea.

Step 9: Write the Introduction and Conclusion

  • Prepare an engaging introduction and a purposeful conclusion.

Step 10: Preach the Sermon

  • Deliver with clarity, passion, and reliance on the Spirit.


IV. COMPONENTS OF AN EXPOSITORY SERMON

A. Introduction

  1. Gathers attention

  2. Presents the Big Idea

  3. Creates a need for the message

B. Body

  1. Organized main points drawn from the text

  2. Subpoints support each main idea

  3. Illustrations clarify the truth

  4. Application provides personal relevance

C. Conclusion

  1. Summarizes key truths

  2. Calls for response or action

  3. Ends with power and direction


V. TYPES OF SERMONS

A. Expository

  • Verse-by-verse explanation of Scripture

B. Textual

  • One main passage with supporting outline

C. Topical

  • Subject-oriented message using various texts

D. Narrative

  • Sermon based on a biblical story with unfolding plot and spiritual truths


VI. QUALITIES OF A GOOD SERMON

  1. Biblical fidelity

  2. Theological soundness

  3. Logical organization

  4. Clear transitions

  5. Practical applications

  6. Spirit-led delivery


VII. COMMON MISTAKES IN PREACHING

  1. Neglecting context and original meaning

  2. Overuse of personal stories without textual support

  3. Failing to provide application

  4. Weak transitions and confusing outlines

  5. Lack of passion or clarity in delivery


VIII. THE LIFE OF THE PREACHER

A. Personal Holiness

  • The preacher must be an example in life and doctrine (1 Tim. 4:12–16).

B. Dependence on the Holy Spirit

  • Both preparation and preaching must be guided by the Spirit.

C. Continual Growth

  • Ongoing study, feedback, and prayer are essential.


IX. FINAL PREACHING CHECKLIST

  • Is the sermon faithful to the biblical text?

  • Is the Big Idea clear and developed?

  • Are the points and transitions smooth and logical?

  • Is the application relevant and specific?

  • Have I prayed and surrendered to the Spirit's leading?




Overview of the Homiletics Teaching Outline


Dr. Rick Griffith's teaching on Homiletics, particularly his course "Homiletics: The Art of Expository Preaching," provides a structured approach to sermon preparation and delivery. This course is designed to guide preachers in crafting sermons that faithfully expound biblical texts.


1. Understanding Expository Preaching

  • Definition: Expository preaching involves explaining a passage in such a way that leads the congregation to a true and practical application of that passage.

  • Purpose: To direct attention to the Bible, ensuring that sermons are grounded in Scripture rather than personal opinions.SlideToDoc

  • Benefits: Expository preaching meets people's true needs for spiritual nourishment and protects against misinterpretation of Scripture.

2. Ten-Step Process for Preparing Expository Sermons

Adapted from Ramesh Richard's "Preparing Expository Sermons," the process includes:

  1. Choose the Text: Select a passage for the sermon.

  2. Analyze the Text: Study the passage in its context.

  3. Exegetical Outline: Develop an outline based on the text's structure.

  4. Exegetical Idea: Summarize the main idea of the passage.

  5. Purpose Bridge: Connect the text's purpose to the audience.

  6. Homiletical Idea: Formulate the sermon’s main idea.

  7. Homiletical Outline: Organize the sermon structure.

  8. Clarity: Ensure the message is clear and understandable.

  9. Introduction and Conclusion: Craft engaging openings and strong closings.

  10. Manuscript and Preach: Write out the sermon and deliver it.

3. Characteristics of Effective Expository Sermons

  • Faithfulness to the Author's Intention: Ensure the sermon aligns with the original message of the text.

  • Cohesion: Maintain a unified theme throughout the sermon.

  • Movement and Direction: Guide the audience through the sermon logically.

  • Application: Provide practical applications for the audience.

4. Advanced Homiletics: Homiletics 2

This course builds upon the foundational principles of Homiletics 1, focusing on:

  • Developing Sermon Outlines: Enhancing skills in creating both exegetical and homiletical outlines.

  • Preaching Various Types of Sermons: Including narrative, topical, evangelistic, wedding, funeral, and controversial sermons.

  • Effective Delivery: Improving confidence and clarity in sermon delivery.

5. Homiletical Outline Checklist

Before finalizing a sermon, Dr. Griffith recommends reviewing a checklist to ensure:

  • Engaging Introduction: Captures attention and introduces the topic.

  • Clear Main Points: Each point is distinct and supports the main idea.

  • Logical Transitions: Smooth flow between points.

  • Strong Conclusion: Reinforces the message and calls for application.



Rodrigo Roa Duterte as the Greatest Drug Lord?

  Debunking the False Narrative: Rodrigo Roa Duterte as the Greatest Drug Lord One of the most widespread yet unfounded accusations against ...